9 users commented in " Better Beer with The Burton Union Blow-off Method "

Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback

in October 11th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

I think that the author missed the mark. There is no proof that top fermenting kraeusen contains junk that would provide an undesirable off flavor brew as related by the numerous brew forums I reviewed. If memory serves me correctly, the Burton Union device was developed to collect yeast at high Kraeusen returning fermenting wort/ beer back to the main vessel. Go ahead and test the theory… brew two batches. I bet you will have a hard time discerning which brew was truly better.
If you want to give the author’s method a try… please feel free to do so. I am pleased with the clarity and quality of my brew without complicating or subjecting it to needless potential exposure.
There are those who do not secondary/ bright tank. This method of “collecting” may be beneficial to those who choose not to transfer off the yeast cake.

in October 11th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Well, everyone has different opinions, but several authors including Papazian and John Palmer note that the tannins and resins at the top of the krausen can create astringent flavors that can be mitigated by skimming the krausen or using the blow off method described here. If you look on the web for terms like “skimming krausen” you will find quite a few references to this effect and technique. But as always – the beer is yours so brew as you like and enjoy what you brew.

in October 14th, 2009 at 9:20 am

I’ve used the blow off method only for a few brews I’ve produced. I think I will try out your idea for a test Brewmeister. It should be easy to do a control test by brewing a small 2 gallon batch and splitting into two 1 gallon fermenters. A little less in the one which will not be using the blow-off tube. I’ll have to do the test and post the results on my blog.

Not sure that the blow off method is a must if you want really good beer. There are homebrewers out there brewing great beers without it, even winning some contests I’d bet.

Doesn’t the blow off method apply to mostly high gravity ales?

in October 29th, 2009 at 6:43 am

[...] is what I want to try next for a blow off, "Burton union Blow off" __________________ Next in line: Kentucky by the sea common, Triple Claussenii [...]

Highprof said,
in December 1st, 2009 at 8:02 am

I have been using the blow off method out of necessity, I only have 22 liter carboys so there is not enough space for the five gallon batch and active fermentation if a small airlock is used. I get quite a bit of blow off in the first 3 to 4 days, depending on the type of yeast used.

My question is… Since ale yeasts are top fermenting is there any danger of too much blow off reducing the amount of yeast left in the carboy to ferment the beer?

tymekeepyr said,
in December 22nd, 2009 at 4:11 am

I have been using a blow-off tube since the second batch of beer I brewed about 5 years ago. I use it for all styles of beer that I make. I switch out a fermentation lock for a blow-off tube as soon as I see activity. I wouldn’t say it is a necessity, nor would I say that it’s harmful. I use 6.5 gal. carboys for primary, usually getting 5.5 gallons into the fermentor (1/2 gal. or so winds up as cold break, etc) so there is about a gallon of headspace. Not all of my beers krauesen the same. In fact, some do not even get high enough to reach the tube.

However, when I recycle a yeast cake (very primitive, mind you. I just run my cooled wort into a carboy that I have racked the beer out of)I usually get a pretty “violent” fermentation within an hour or two. It is much more robust than pitching from a Wyeast smack pack, lots of krauesen travels through the tube and I find it almost a necessity when using this method.

As far as blowing out too much yeast, I don’t think that it could ever happen. The population of yeast in the wort at peak fermentation is ridiculous. I would wager that you would have to blow out the whole batch (i.e. empty the carboy) for this to happen since if it is actively fermenting, the yeast has not flocculated.

All said, I have never had (knocking on wood here) a contaminated wort by using this method. A friend that also brews with me does not use this method as much and I have noticed that we can both brew the same beer (splitting a 10 batch) and the one using the blow-off method seems to be a bit crisper and clears out a bit faster.

in March 1st, 2010 at 9:45 am

[...] hope it does blow off. That's what the big tube is for. http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2009/10/10/better-beer-with-the-burton-union-blow-off-method/ __________________ Arron – quality over quantity beer [...]

in March 19th, 2010 at 3:45 am

[...] Burton Blow Off Method, the disadvantage I see is that you could potentially lose a lot of beer. http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2009/10/10/better-beer-with-the-burton-union-blow-off-method/ __________________ "Prohibition makes you want to cry into your beer, and denies you the [...]

in March 25th, 2010 at 10:20 am

[...] Originally Posted by uechikid If you're not using a 6.5 gallon carboy as your primary fermenter you should. Then the need for a blow off tube will only arise when you make really high gravity beers. When I do need a blow off tube I use tubing that just fits into the opening of the carboy (smaller tubing can still get clogged). The other end goes into a bucket with sterilizing solution. That is more of a preference, I like the blow off method to purge some things for me (also a preference). The blow-off method is solid and works fine, no need to spend more $ on another carboy (I'm also frugal). A $2 tube will be enough. http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2009/10/10/better-beer-with-the-burton-union-blow-off-method/ [...]

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)