<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Batch Sparge: A Guide for Batch Sparging and No Sparge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/</link>
	<description>Get weekly articles on home brewing, beer styles, and making beer recipes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Banjoman</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-14013</link>
		<dc:creator>Banjoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-14013</guid>
		<description>A helpful article for someone about to do their first Batch Sparge All Grain.  But it would be nice if you could use Pounds/Ounces for weight vice the Metric system and translate that information for the computations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A helpful article for someone about to do their first Batch Sparge All Grain.  But it would be nice if you could use Pounds/Ounces for weight vice the Metric system and translate that information for the computations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-7591</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-7591</guid>
		<description>Hi,
  I generally sparge with water at around 168F.  If the sparge water is too hot it can extract unwanted tannins.

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
  I generally sparge with water at around 168F.  If the sparge water is too hot it can extract unwanted tannins.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arboyd</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-7578</link>
		<dc:creator>Arboyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-7578</guid>
		<description>So is the temperature recommended for the sparge water addtions intended to be the temperature of the water only or the total temperature of the mash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is the temperature recommended for the sparge water addtions intended to be the temperature of the water only or the total temperature of the mash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>CraigA --
  I agree - if you want to assure this you do need to measure and monitor the SG of the runoff.  However for most batch sparge situations you rarely sparge below this limit unless brewing very low gravity beer.

Thanks - Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CraigA &#8211;<br />
  I agree &#8211; if you want to assure this you do need to measure and monitor the SG of the runoff.  However for most batch sparge situations you rarely sparge below this limit unless brewing very low gravity beer.</p>
<p>Thanks &#8211; Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigA</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>In using the &#039;single infusion, medium body, batch sparge&#039; mashing profile, it seems there is no guarantee that the SG of the runoff stays above 1.019.  This is a suggested lower limit for avoiding extracting tannins.  See for example
http://home.elp.rr.com/brewbeer/files/nbsparge.html

Any advice on creating a mash profile that will do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In using the &#8217;single infusion, medium body, batch sparge&#8217; mashing profile, it seems there is no guarantee that the SG of the runoff stays above 1.019.  This is a suggested lower limit for avoiding extracting tannins.  See for example<br />
<a href="http://home.elp.rr.com/brewbeer/files/nbsparge.html" rel="nofollow">http://home.elp.rr.com/brewbeer/files/nbsparge.html</a></p>
<p>Any advice on creating a mash profile that will do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeerSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>BeerSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>DavidP,
 I believe that&#039;s what the new option does - it calculates the addition to the mash water for the first step that produces 50% of the target boil volume (addition plus non-absorbed mash water).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavidP,<br />
 I believe that&#8217;s what the new option does &#8211; it calculates the addition to the mash water for the first step that produces 50% of the target boil volume (addition plus non-absorbed mash water).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidP</title>
		<link>http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beersmith.com/blog/2008/03/09/how-to-batch-sparge-a-guide-for-batch-sparging-and-no-sparge/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>It would be nice it Beersmith would have a &quot;Denny Conn&quot; batch sparge option.  This would add the top-up/mashout step that occurs before the first drain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice it Beersmith would have a &#8220;Denny Conn&#8221; batch sparge option.  This would add the top-up/mashout step that occurs before the first drain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
